Search for: "Mipo Technology Limited"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 3:41 pm
(“APM”); Mipo Technology Limited (“Mipo Tech”); Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:25 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. of Taiwan, Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of Miami, Florida, SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors of Miami, Florida, and PTC Holding Limited of Hong Kong as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:49 pm
(“APM”); Mipo Technology Limited (“Mipo Tech”); Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:11 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. of Taiwan, Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc. of Taiwan, Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, PTC Holdings Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a/ Mipo America, Ltd. of Miami, Florida, and SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a/ All Colors of Miami, Florida as the Respondents in this… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:19 pm
The complaint alleges that MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. of Taiwan, Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of Miami, Florida, SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors of Miami, Florida, and PTC Holdings Limited of Hong Kong (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the United States, sell for… [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:21 pm
The complaint alleges that MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. of Taiwan (“MicroJet”), Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc. of Taiwan (“APM”), Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of Miami, Florida, SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors of Miami, Florida, and PTC Holdings Limited of Hong Kong (“PTC”)… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm
(“APM”); Mipo Technology Limited; Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd.; Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd.; SinoTime Technologies, Inc.; and PTC Holdings Limited (“PTC”) of infringing certain claims of U.S Patent Nos. 6,234,598; 6,309,053; 6,398,347; 6,412,917; 6,481,817; 6,402,279; and 6,412,917. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 pm
As to importation, ALJ Rogers determined that HP’s motion focused on the alleged importation of accused products by former respondents (“the Mipo entities”) and did not address the importation issues unique to APM, which allegedly sells components to defaulting respondent MicroJet, which in turn manufactures and sells the accused inkjet cartridges to other companies (e.g., the Mipo entities) that eventually import them into the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Deepak Mangal & Others (Spicy IP) STEM and AUTM collaborate to build sustainable technology transfer systems in India (SiNApSE) Mexico Amendments to Mexican Industrial Property Statute make trademark filings less formal, but also raise some concerns (RelatIP) Netherlands The Hague Court of Appeal on Dutch patents limited by claim amendment: Bébécar-Utilidades Para Crianca LDA v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) What happens when an opponent stops opposing: Delnorth Pty Ltd v Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd (ipwars) Urgent interlocutory and declaratory relief: AED Oil Limited & Anor v Puffin FPSO Limited (ipwars) Infringement of copyright in musical works: a riff Down Under: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (JIPLP) Austria Austria: opposition possible… [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
No. 337-TA-615 (ITC 337 Update) Hewlett-Packard – Initial determination terminates Mipo International Ltd. and Shenzhen Print Media Co., Ltd. from Inv. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
(IPKat) ECJ: Distinctive character must be acquired through use of trade mark before date of application: Imagination Technologies Ltd v OHIM (IPKat) (Class 46) EPO appeal ‘invalid for insufficiency’: Pipe for filling bottles/Gallardo Gonzales (PatLit) Prevent patents inhibiting knowledge diffusion for green technology, EU told (Intellectual Property Watch) IPREG to regulate IP professionals (IPKat) Tricky European patent question: what happens when… [read post]
